• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle

Supreme Court Grants Review For Free Speech Case Involving ‘Trump Too Small’ Trademark

June 5, 2023

Bill Clinton Denies Trump’s Involvement with Epstein, Comer Claims.

February 27, 2026

New bill by GOP Rep Nancy Mace proposes harsh penalties for child rapists

February 27, 2026

“Trump Feels Displeased with Iran Negotiations, Yet to Decide on Potential US Strikes”

February 27, 2026

Clinton Deposed in Epstein Case Almost Three Decades After Blue Dress Scandal – Flashback!

February 27, 2026

Susie Wiles’ attorney rejects FBI recording approval, citing ethical concerns.

February 27, 2026

Tech company respectfully declines Pentagon’s request for unrestricted use of AI technology

February 27, 2026

Discover the range of Iran’s ballistic missiles and their proximity to the US!

February 27, 2026

Discover how far Iran’s ballistic missiles can reach and their proximity to the US!

February 27, 2026

Iran’s Ballistic Missiles: How Close They Can Get to the US and Where They Can Reach!

February 27, 2026

Vance assures there is ‘no risk’ of US getting stuck in long Middle East conflict amid Iran tensions.

February 27, 2026

DOJ Takes Legal Action Against 5 States for Access to Voter Rolls: ‘We are Committed and Unstoppable’.

February 27, 2026

FAA Enforces Restrictions on Texas Airspace Following Reports of Pentagon Incident with Customs and Border Protection Drone

February 27, 2026
  • Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
Friday, February 27, 2026
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Supreme Court Grants Review For Free Speech Case Involving ‘Trump Too Small’ Trademark

by The Daily Caller
June 5, 2023 at 1:38 pm
in News, Wire
240 12
0

WASHINGTON, D.C. - APRIL 19, 2018: The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C., is the seat of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Judicial Branch of government. (Photo by Robert Alexander/Getty Images)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Daily Caller News Foundation

The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a free speech case involving a trademark that harkens back to a crude joke Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio made at former President Donald Trump’s expense during the 2016 election.

The case, Vidal v. Elster, stems from a T-shirt made by Steve Elster with the words “Trump too small,” a reference to Rubio’s joke about Trump’s “small hands” during a campaign rally in 2016, where he told the crowd “you know what they say about guys with small hands.” The United States Patent & Trademark Office declined to register Elster’s mark under Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act, which bans the registration of trademarks that include “a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent.”

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the decision in February 2022, finding the application of Section 2(c) to Elster’s mark “unconstitutionally restricts free speech in violation of the First Amendment.”

“The PTO’s refusal to register Elster’s mark cannot be sustained because the government does not have a privacy or publicity interest in restricting speech critical of government officials or public figures in the trademark context—at least absent actual malice, which is not alleged here,” the court found.

Ester stated during his registration request that he wanted to convey “that some features of President Trump and his policies are diminutive,” according to court documents. The back of the t-shirt states “Trump’s package is too small” along with a list of policy areas he is “small on,” including the environment, civil rights, immigrant rights, LGBTQ rights, workers’ rights, voting rights and affordable health care.

Ester argues in a brief filed with the Supreme Court that the statute “makes it virtually impossible to register a mark that expresses an opinion about a public figure—including a political message (as here) that is critical of the President of the United States.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Tags: DCNFDonald TrumpMarco RubiopoliticsSupreme Court
Share196Tweet123
The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage