• Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home IJR

Supreme Court Justice Hits Back at Trump’s Lawyer: He Is Not ‘Above the Law’

Alex Thomas by Alex Thomas
May 12, 2020 at 3:53 pm
in IJR
235 17
44
Trump May Help Offset States’ Coronavirus Costs: Hassett

FILE PHOTO - U.S. President Donald Trump meets with senior military leadership and the National Security Team in the Cabinet room at the White House in Washington, U.S., May 9, 2020. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

After months of jockeying through lesser courts, the Supreme Court finally began hearing arguments this week over whether to President Donald Trump can keep his tax returns from Congressional committees and the Manhattan district attorney.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow argued, “This court has long recognize that the president is not to be treated as an ordinary citizen. He has responsibilities — he is, himself, a branch of government. He is the only individual that is a branch of government in our federal system.”

Sekulow continued, “Our position is that the Constitution itself, both in structure and text, supports the position that the president would be temporarily immune from this activity from a state proceeding while he is the President of the United States.”

But Justice Sonia Sotomayor was not buying that argument, saying, “I’m not sure why he’s entitled to more immunity for private acts than he should be for public acts.”

Sekulow noted that “he is the President of the United States.” But Sotomayor still seemed bemused, saying, “We only give judicial officers and congressional officers immunity for acts within their official capacity.”

Justice Elena Kagan quickly added, “It’s also true and indeed a fundamental precept of our conditional order that a president isn’t above the law. From our first days, Chief Justice Marshall told Thomas Jefferson that he could be subpoenaed, he could be examined as a witness, he could be required to produce papers.”

Justice Elena Kagan: "A President isn't above the law." pic.twitter.com/6pWcbxQwNA

— The Hill (@thehill) May 12, 2020

Trump’s lawyers argued essentially that as president, he is protected from most legal proceedings. Trump attorney Patrick Strawbridge argued, “What we’re seeking here is presidential finances.”

But Sotomayor retorted, “Not presidential finances, we’re asking for his personal tax returns before he became president. Those are very different things and we’re not asking him to produce it,” she also noted that subpoenas are not to Trump but to accountants and financial institutions.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: "We’re asking for his personal tax returns before he became President." pic.twitter.com/rln5jhmQcA

— The Hill (@thehill) May 12, 2020

The legal battle escalated in late 2019 when an appeals court determined that Deutsche Bank and Capital One are legally required to comply with the congressional subpoenas.

Tags: Donald Trumpelana kaganJay SekulowSonia SotomayorSupreme Court
[firefly_poll]

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage