• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
‘Not Going Back’: Abortion Rights Forces Voice Worry Outside U.S. Supreme Court

SC Bill Bans Websites that Assist Women in Obtaining Abortions

July 22, 2022

Iran’s funding becomes pivotal challenge for Johnson’s narrow House majority

March 21, 2026

Warren Raises Concerns Over Hegseth’s Tattoo, But Supports Candidate with Controversial Ink

March 21, 2026

Swalwell highlights sports background to ease concerns about DHS action at World Cup.

March 21, 2026

Republican senator’s move uncovers Democratic hypocrisy on voter ID support.

March 21, 2026

Critics Call for Austin DA’s Resignation Amid Accusations of ‘Secret Meetings’ in Police Case Supported by Soros Funding.

March 21, 2026

DHS shutdown enters second month as Dems aim to exclude ICE from new funding agreement – click for more!

March 21, 2026

NYC Mayor Mamdani’s wife praised controversial figures online, voiced criticism of US military: new findings.

March 21, 2026

Report: NYC Mayor Mamdani’s wife praised controversial figures in social media posts, slammed US military

March 21, 2026

Report: NYC Mayor Mamdani’s Wife Praises Terrorists and Criticizes US Military in Online Posts

March 21, 2026

Report: NYC Mayor Mamdani’s spouse praises terrorists, condemns US military in social media posts.

March 21, 2026

Report: NYC Mayor Mamdani’s wife praised terrorists and criticized US military in online posts.

March 21, 2026

Report: NYC Mayor Mamdani’s Wife Praises Terrorists and Criticizes US Military Online

March 20, 2026
  • Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
Saturday, March 21, 2026
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

SC Bill Bans Websites that Assist Women in Obtaining Abortions

by Savannah Hulsey Pointer
July 22, 2022 at 4:15 pm
in News
247 5
0
‘Not Going Back’: Abortion Rights Forces Voice Worry Outside U.S. Supreme Court

Pro-life and pro-choice demonstrators argue outside of the U.S. Supreme Court as justices hear a major abortion case on the legality of a Republican-backed Louisiana law that imposes restrictions on abortion doctors, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 4, 2020. Tom Brenner/Reuters

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

South Carolina state senators proposed legislation that would make it unlawful to assist or conspire with someone in obtaining an abortion.

The state lawmakers’ move to introduce the bill came shortly after the Supreme Court repealed the federal protections for abortion nationwide, according to a report by The Washington Post.

Provisions in the bill would forbid giving advice on how to get an abortion over the phone or the internet as well as making it illegal to host a website with similar information.

Verbiage from the bill also indicates that it would be illegal to engage in “offering or providing abortion doula services, knowing that the services will be used, or are reasonably likely to be used for an abortion.”

Additionally, if passed the legislation plans to make it an illegal act to provide a “referral to an abortion provider, knowing that the referral will result, or is reasonably likely to result, in an abortion.”

The same standard would apply to anyone “providing a referral to an abortion provider and receiving monetary remuneration, or other compensation, from an abortion provider for the referral.”

According to The Washington Post, some legal scholars believe this proposal could restrict communication and speech, which could present fierce legal challenges in the future.

The publication also reports that the South Carolina bill was created by using a model put together by the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).

NRLC announced on June 15 that it had produced a proposed “post-Roe Model Abortion law for the states to adopt” even before Roe v. Wade was overturned on June 24 in anticipation of the pro-life victory.

Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life, said of the model legislation, “For decades, National Right to Life and its state affiliates have led the effort to pass life-affirming laws at the state level that protect unborn children and their mothers – efforts that have drastically reduced the number of abortions and brought us to this moment in our nation’s history.”

“With this model law, we a (sic) laying out a roadmap for the right-to-life movement so that, in a post-Roe society, we can protect many mothers and their children from the tragedy of abortion,” Tobias went on.

The group said their model law is an attempt to protect unborn life, and prevent abortion except in the cases where it is necessary to protect the life of the mother.

Tags: AbortionpoliticsRoe V. WadeSouth Carolina
Share196Tweet123
Savannah Hulsey Pointer

Savannah Hulsey Pointer

IJR, Contributor

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage