• Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Nadler Says Justice Thomas Did Not Mention Interracial Marriage Decision Because He Is ‘Intermarried’

Savannah Hulsey Pointer by Savannah Hulsey Pointer
July 20, 2022 at 3:42 pm
in News
237 15
0
Nadler Says Justice Thomas Did Not Mention Interracial Marriage Decision Because He Is ‘Intermarried’
491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) claims Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas didn’t bring up a landmark marriage case because he is “intermarried.”

Nadler took his swipe at Thomas while speaking on the floor of the House of Representatives about the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

The New York Democrat admonished Thomas for his recommendation that the nation’s high court review the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize gay marriage.

“He didn’t mention (interracial marriage) for some reason,” Nadler said in a speech on the floor of the House of Representatives. “Maybe the fact that he’s intermarried … had something to do with it.”

Rep. Nadler said Justice Thomas didn't mention interracial marriage in his Dobbs concurrence b/c he's married to a white woman.

"He didn't mention Loving for some reason…maybe the fact that he's intermarried and so is Senator McConnell, maybe that had something to do with it." pic.twitter.com/wvSFyQOqw8

— Washington Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) July 19, 2022

Nadler was referencing the 1967 case Loving v. Virginia that legalized interracial marriage, which stated that the laws banning interracial marriage were in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Nadler’s comments received harsh pushback from Twitter users who railed on his personal jab over a legal issue.

“Or… maybe it’s because Loving v. Virginia was decided upon a totally different constitutional basis than right to privacy cases like Roe, and isn’t in any danger of being overruled. Are we to believe that Nadler, an attorney, doesn’t understand that distinction?” one user asked. 

Steve Guest, the Special Advisor for Communications for Sen. Ted Cruz, said, “Only a Democrat would use a word like ‘intermarried.'”

Only a Democrat would use a word like "intermarried." https://t.co/OCd4fPGqDZ

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) July 19, 2022

Another user said, that Nadler, who has been in office for two decades is a great example of the need for term limits. 

Thomas’ comments on Lawrence, however, were to argue that the high court misapplied the Fourteenth Amendment when they asserted that it covered homosexual relationships and the right to gay marriage.

And despite members of the cast telling her otherwise, Whoopi insisted her falsehoods were the truth.
"I'm telling you, when he spoke about all the things that could go, this was one of the things he brought up." pic.twitter.com/Fqjcl2Cjsh

— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) July 20, 2022

IJR previously reported ABC daytime host Whoopi Goldberg claimed Thomas wants to throw out the Supreme Court’s decision legalizing interracial marriage.

Tags: Clarence ThomasJerry NadlerpoliticsRoe V. Wade
[firefly_poll]

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage