• Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home IJR

‘We Did the Best Thing We Can’: Bloomberg Defends ‘Stop-And-Frisk’ Program, Cites Decreased Murder Rate

Bradley Cortright by Bradley Cortright
January 15, 2020 at 10:19 am
in IJR
235 17
5
‘We Did the Best Thing We Can’: Bloomberg Defends ‘Stop-And-Frisk’ Program, Cites Decreased Murder Rate
491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D) defended the controversial “stop-and-frisk” program that was implemented during his tenure.

During an appearance on “The Late Show” on Tuesday, host Stephen Colbert asked Bloomberg why he apologized for the policy shortly before he announced he was running for president.

Bloomberg defended the policy because, he said, it helped decrease the murder rate. But he said when the policy started “getting out of control,” he decided to see if rolling it back would lead to an increase in murders.

“[I] Actually talked to the woman who’s my assistant — has a young son. And we talked about what would happen if her son was getting stopped. And I took a look and said, ‘Let’s try something, stop doing the stop-and-frisk and see what happens.’ We thought murders would go up. It didn’t. So I said, ‘Let’s phase it out.’ And before I left office, we cut 95% of them out.”

Watch his comments below:

Bloomberg continued to say he “made a mistake,” noting that sometimes “not everything goes the right way.”

But Colbert pressed Bloomberg on the criticism of the policy during his tenure in office and asked, “Why not assess it while it’s going on? As a leader, we want to know that when you’re in power, you change your mind, not after it doesn’t matter.”

“No, we did. But the murder rate from 650 down to 300, we reduced dramatically,” Bloomberg responded.

Colbert countered, “But you said afterward that it wasn’t because of stop-and-frisk, cause when you stopped, it didn’t change anything.”

Still, Bloomberg defended the program — in its early stages — and cited a series of policies he implemented to try to bring violent crime rates down.

“Well, we did the best thing we can. I think it had something to do with it at some point in time. You do too much of one thing, then you should stop doing it. We reduced the incarceration rate. We reduced the recidivism rate. We started a whole bunch of programs for young kids — one of which President Obama copied for the nation. You just have to do all the different things and try and see what happens.”

Despite defending it for years, Bloomberg apologized for the “stop-and-frisk” program before announcing his candidacy, saying, “I was wrong,” as IJR previously reported.

He has been criticized for apologizing for “stop-and-frisk” — which has been seen as a policy that unfairly targeted people of color —just before his candidacy. Critics charged that he only apologized to help his presidential bid win over minority voters.

Tags: 2020 Presidential ElectionMichael BloombergStephen Colbert
[firefly_poll]

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage