• Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home IJR

Biden Campaign Co-Chair Defends Not Answering Questions About Court Packing

Bradley Cortright by Bradley Cortright
October 11, 2020 at 12:45 pm
in IJR
247 5
1
Biden Campaign Co-Chair Defends Not Answering Questions About Court Packing
491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his Democratic allies are insisting that the former vice president should not disclose whether or not he would support expanding the Supreme Court because the question is a “distraction.”

Rep. Cedric Richmond (D-La.) told ABC News’ Jon Karl, “That’s a better question for me. I’m in Congress. It would take legislation from the United States Congress and the United States Senate to do it.”

“But I think that Joe Biden and Senator Harris are very clear, that it is a distraction. We should not be talking about a hypothetical court packing once this nominee is confirmed,” he continued.

Court packing typically refers to the idea of passing legislation to increase the number of Supreme Court justices. 

Richmond continued to claim that “when we’re talking about packing, we’re talking about all the judges that [President Donald Trump] is packing on the court right now.”

He also hit Trump for appointing 50 circuit court judges, and not one nominee was Black.

“He packed the appellate court, the circuit court, with 50 judges. But I bet you he didn’t mention that to Black or brown people yesterday at his White House rally, that out of 50 circuit court judges, he couldn’t find one qualified black person to sit on the circuit court. So when you talk about court packing, that’s what they’re doing.”

“But to answer that question would be a distraction,” he added. 

Watch the video below:

Biden still won’t say whether he supports court packing.

 @jonkarl: “Does he support expanding the Supreme Court?”

Rep. Cedric Richmond: “Joe Biden and Sen. Harris are very clear that it is a distraction. We should not be talking about a hypothetical.” https://t.co/Hcs1jrZbE6 pic.twitter.com/Py3DhGVyZM

— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) October 11, 2020

Karl returned to the issue of court packing and noted that Richmond said it was a better question for members of Congress. He asked, “You’re a member of Congress, we can ask you. You’re the co-chair of the campaign. Where do you stand on the issue of expanding the Supreme Court? Are you in favor of it?”

“Well, actually, I just want to spend my time now, one making sure Donald Trump loses. But, two, making sure we don’t confirm this judge,” Richmond responded. 

When Karl noted that he did not answer the question, Richmond said, “It’s a legitimate question for you to ask. But it’s a distraction 22 days before the election.”

Biden has been reluctant to answer whether or not he would support legislation to expand the Supreme Court. Last week, he told reporters that “you’ll know my opinion on court-packing when the election is over.”

Tags: 2020 Presidential ElectionJoe BidenSupreme Court
[firefly_poll]

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage