• Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home IJR

Biden Admin To ‘No Longer Defend’ Trump’s ‘Public Charge’ Rule

Bradley Cortright by Bradley Cortright
March 10, 2021 at 2:16 pm
in IJR
245 7
0

U.S. President Joe Biden sits in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, after his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States, U.S., January 20, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Brenner

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

President Joe Biden’s administration will no longer defend a Trump-era policy that let officials reject green card applications who might need public assistance. 

“The government will no longer defend the 2019 public charge rule as doing so is neither in the public interest nor an efficient use of limited government resources,” the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) press release on Wednesday reads.

In a statement, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said, “The 2019 public charge rule was not in keeping with our nation’s values. It penalized those who access health benefits and other government services available to them.”

“Consistent with the President’s vision, we will continue to implement reforms that improve our legal immigration system,” it added. 

Then-President Donald Trump implemented a “public charge” policy in 2019 that allowed officials to reject green card applications for those who might require public assistance, such as food stamps.

The policy expanded the definition of a “public charge” in the Immigration and Nationality Act as someone that may become dependent on government benefits such as food stamps, housing assistance, or Medicaid.

That law gives officials the ability to reject applications for visas , green cards, or entry to the U.S. if they are at risk of becoming a “public charge.”

Before the Trump-era change, it considered someone a “public charge” if they received “public cash assistance.”

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

The DHS clarified that it “will not consider a person’s receipt of Medicaid (except for Medicaid for long-term institutionalization), public housing, or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits as part of the public charge inadmissibility determination.”

The Trump administration argued its policy would encourage “self-sufficiency” among immigrants. 

However, a 2020 Urban Institute study found that the policy had a “chilling effect” on immigrants in the country as roughly 13% of immigrant families avoided noncash benefits “because of concerns about future green card applications.”

The study added, “Immigrant families avoided public benefits and supports not only because of perceived risks of how the public charge rule might affect their ability to secure a green card but because of broader immigration concerns, such as the risk of information being shared with immigration enforcement authorities or the deportation of family members.”

In February, Biden ordered a review of the “public charge” policy shortly after taking office. 

Tags: Donald TrumpImmigrationJoe Biden
[firefly_poll]

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage