• Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

AOC Demands 2 Big Changes in Response To Texas Abortion Law

Bradley Cortright by Bradley Cortright
September 2, 2021 at 10:31 am
in News
247 5
0
AOC Demands 2 Big Changes in Response To Texas Abortion Law

(Matt Johnson/Flickr)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is calling for big changes after the Supreme Court refused to block Texas’ strict abortion law.

In a tweet on Wednesday night, the New York Congresswoman said, “Republicans promised to overturn Roe v Wade, and they have.”

“Democrats can either abolish the filibuster and expand the court, or do nothing as millions of peoples’ bodies, rights, and lives are sacrificed for far-right minority rule,” she continued.

Finally, she said, “This shouldn’t be a difficult decision.”

Republicans promised to overturn Roe v Wade, and they have.

Democrats can either abolish the filibuster and expand the court, or do nothing as millions of peoples’ bodies, rights, and lives are sacrificed for far-right minority rule.

This shouldn’t be a difficult decision. https://t.co/GcEjkxt3gs

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) September 2, 2021

Ocasio-Cortez’s comments come after the Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling did not block Texas’ abortion law which is the most restrictive in the nation.

The law, which went into effect on Wednesday, bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected. It also provides incentives for individuals to sue anyone suspected of helping a woman get an abortion by providing a reward of at least $10,000.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the court’s three liberal judges in the dissent.

The New York Times reports, “The majority opinion was unsigned and consisted of a single long paragraph. It said the abortion providers who had challenged the law in an emergency application to the court had not made their case in the face of ‘complex and novel’ procedural questions. The majority stressed that it was not ruling on the constitutionality of the Texas law and did not mean to limit ‘procedurally proper challenges’ to it.”

Progressives have been pushing Senate Democrats to eliminate the filibuster, a procedural hurdle used to delay or block legislation, which would let them pass bills with just 51 votes in the upper chamber instead of 60.

The Senate is currently divided 50-50, meaning Democrats need at least 10 Republicans to vote for legislation for it to pass the chamber.

Meanwhile, some Democrats want to increase the number of justices on the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority after former President Donald Trump appointed three justices.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) suggested that four seats should be added to the court to create a 7-6 liberal majority, which he claimed would “shore up the public’s confidence in the court and its legitimacy in the public’s eyes.”

Tags: Alexandria Ocasio-CortezpoliticsSupreme Court
[firefly_poll]

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage