• Trending Topics:    
  • 2024 Election
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Sports
  • Immigration
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Jane Fonda Suggests Redefining ‘Vaginas as AK47s’ in Response to SCOTUS Decision on Roe v. Wade

Savannah Rychcik by Savannah Rychcik
June 30, 2022 at 10:16 am
in News
250 2
0
Jane Fonda Suggests Redefining ‘Vaginas as AK47s’ in Response to SCOTUS Decision on Roe v. Wade

HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 23: Jane Fonda attends the Los Angeles Special FYC Event For Netflix's "Grace And Frankie" at NeueHouse Los Angeles on April 23, 2022 in Hollywood, California. (Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images,)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jane Fonda issued a strong response to the reversal of Roe v. Wade.

She tweeted on Tuesday, “If a corporation can be defined as a person, why not redefine vaginas as AK47s.”

Fonda added, “That way they’d be free of governmental restrictions by those who care about ‘the sanctity of life.'”

If a corporation can be defined as a person, why not redefine vaginas as AK47s. That way they’d be free of governmental restrictions by those who care about ‘the sanctity of life’.

— Jane Seymour Fonda (@Janefonda) June 28, 2022

Last month, Fonda commented on the leak of the Supreme Court draft decision showing the landmark ruling could be overturned.

She said during an appearance on “The View,” “The same type of people that support this ending of Roe v. Wade, ending the idea that a woman has the right to control her own body, are the same people that don’t want to be vaccinated.”

Fonda continued, “[They say], ‘Don’t tell me what to do, the government can’t be involved in what I shoot into my body,’ and yet they’re willing to support taking away from a woman her constitutional right, her human right, to determine what happens to her body and if she has or doesn’t have a child. It’s unconscionable.”

She told viewers to “fight like hell to not allow this to happen.”

The actress went on to say if it did get overturned, people should “fight like hell through the vote.”

Fonda argued Americans “allowed someone to be elected to office who has put three fringe, right-wing people into the Supreme Court, which is supposed to be a non-political, non-activist body.”

According to her, “This is the most activist, politically oriented, narrowly focused Supreme Court in United States history, so we have to vote, we have to mobilize to get out the vote in the midterm elections and in 2024 to make sure that we don’t put in office anyone who does not support women’s right to choose and doesn’t understand the crisis called the climate crisis, which we have only eight years to address.”

The political activist is not the only celebrity to react strongly to the ruling.

Actress Bette Midler invoked Viagra into her reaction, as IJR reported.

“Time to ban Viagra,” Midler tweeted.

She added, “Because if pregnancy is ‘God’s will’, then so is your limp d***.”

Additionally, during the 2022 BET Awards Sunday night, celebrities took the opportunity to speak out against the ruling.

Tags: AbortiongunsJane FondaSupreme CourtU.S. News
[firefly_poll]

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Headlines

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage